Wrecking Ball
Mark 13:1-8
Proper 28B
November 18, 2013
Proper 28B
November 18, 2013
Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
“Gosh, Teacher! Look at all
those huge buildings made with really big stones!” They were tourists, country folks visiting
their nation’s political, cultural, and religious center. They were overwhelmed by the crowds, by the
variety and quantity of the merchandise for sale in the booths that lined the
squares, by the aroma of the cooking fires.
But most of all they were overawed by the buildings, by the
architecture. They were almost
speechless and could only muster, “Big buildings! Big chunks of stone!”
And that’s what was supposed to happen. All buildings are statements in stone, brick,
concrete and wood. One building may say,
“The person who lives here is rich enough to afford more house than they
need.” Another may say, “This is a house
that ordinary people can afford to raise a family in.” Another building may say, “This is a place where
you can leave your money with confidence.”
Every building is a statement.
Our county courthouse is as imposing as we can afford. It is as solid as we like to think that we are. It says that the business of governing the
county is something that we take pretty seriously. Set back on all sides from other buildings it
announces that its purposes are important.
It intends for us to experience something just a little short of awe—respect,
maybe. Like all public buildings it is
what some have called “propaganda in stone.”
Our county courthouse advocates for life in our community. It says that we are not frivolous
people. We take community
seriously. It tells a story about us
that we want to tell.
I’ve heard Washington, D.C., described as the greatest home-court
advantage of any head of state in the world.
Washington was designed to be impressive, even intimidating. Its neo-classical style announces to all visitors
that we see ourselves as the fulfillment of ancient dreams of justice and
liberty given modern form and expression.
In our day there are so many different forms of media that we may
not notice what message our architecture is sending. We may even think that it’s not saying
anything at all. But the ancients were
not deluded; they knew that the visual impact of a city is as important in
projecting power as its armies. Nothing
was left to chance. The approaches to
the center of a city, what could be seen, and from where things could be seen: all
of these things were planned and executed deliberately.
The disciples reacted just as the movers and shakers in Jerusalem intended
that they should react. And what was the
message in stone that bombarded them into incoherence?
The Temple complex that the disciples experienced was the work of
Herod the Great. Herod had rebuilt the
Temple some fifty years before the disciples’ visit, although work on some of
the courtyards and outbuildings would go on for another thirty years after
that. Herod’s Temple, as it is sometimes
called, announced that Herod’s kingship and Judaea’s status as a Roman
territory were perfectly compatible with life as a Jewish community. The Temple declared in stone that all one had
to do to reconcile those competing identities was to obey Herod (and his Roman
masters), tend to the sacrificial system of the Temple, and follow the Torah and
all would be well in the Jewish world.
The Temple was a bold statement by a master of politics, but at its
heart were deep contradictions. First
was the matter of bringing together the Jewish worship of one God and one God
only and the Roman system of many gods and goddesses and especially the
requirement that subjects of Empire demonstrate their loyalty by offering
sacrifices to the divine spirit of the emperor.
Jews could not do this because the Torah forbade it. The brilliant compromise that allowed the
Romans to recognize the Jewish religion was that daily sacrifices were offered,
not to the emperor, but for the emperor, for his benefit and
welfare and on his behalf.
There was a deeper contradiction, though, that wasn’t so easy to
work out: the Roman system of governance was based on values that stood in
marked contrast to the values of the Jewish tradition. The “good life” for Romans was based on
Prosperity. Prosperity was the gift of
Peace. Peace was the fruit of
Victory. Victory was the result of the
Roman ability to bring crushing violence to bear on any enemy inside or outside
of the Empire and to bring that violence to bear on very short notice.
The Jewish tradition on the other hand valued a “good life” that was
founded on justice for the poor and the marginalized. Social justice led to peace and peace led, not
to limitless riches, but to abundance, that is, to “enough” and a little more.
The Temple looked and sounded Jewish. But the product of this ideology in stone was
not the shared abundance that the Torah demanded. Wealth flowed to the Temple and
it never came back. The Temple became, not
a proclamation of God’s and of God’s people’s intention to protect the poor and
the marginalized, but an apparatus for extracting what little wealth the poor
had managed to produce and retain.
The disciples were taken in by Herod’s propaganda: “Gee,
teacher! Look at those buildings! Look at those huge blocks of stone!” Jesus saw through the propaganda to what was
really going on, to the contradictions that Herod’s Temple was trying to paper
over: “You see these buildings? They are
impressive aren’t they? You must
recognize that the whole complex is unstable.
It rests on a contradiction. It
is a lie. It will all come down. The wrecking ball will spare nothing.”
Herod offered this propaganda in stone because it helped him secure
his power. People accepted the
propaganda because it made them comfortable.
It let them go on living without facing the inner contradiction of their
lives. But that was not a stable
arrangement. And in forty years
history’s wrecking did swing and it spared nothing except a retaining wall that
today is called the “Wailing Wall.” The instrument
of that destruction was the Roman Empire, but the cause was the
contradictions that the people of Jerusalem refused to face. “Jerusalem, Jerusalem!” Jesus said, “How
often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her
brood under her wings, and you were not willing! See, your house is left to you, desolate.”
I wonder what Jesus would say of what we have built, of our houses, of
our churches, of our stores and businesses, of our civic buildings in Decorah and
Des Moines and Washington. Would he find
them impressive? Or would he see through
them to the contradictions we don’t want to face?
And what of what we have built, not on our streets, but in our
heads: the patterns of thought that we have built up until they have become a
mental house that we live in, in which we have found safety and made ourselves
comfortable? Would he admire them? Or would he see through them to lies that we
are telling ourselves because it makes our lives easier and more comfortable?
I don’t know. Or rather, I’m
afraid that I do know. The
trouble is I see the contradictions in others’ lives more easily than I see
them in my own. It is easier to be
outraged at others’ behavior and to demand change from them than it is to
confront my own and commit myself to change.
And yet, I have no reason to believe that I am immune to the wrecking
ball. Just because I don’t want to be
aware of my inner contradictions does not mean that they aren’t there.
All I can do, my brothers and sisters, is to confess to you that I
am broken and that I need your help in uncovering the lies that I am telling
myself so that with God’s grace I may find my way to the integrity that will
prevent my life from collapsing under the weight of its own
contradictions.
This is a painful place to be, as anyone who has been there can
testify. But it is also a hopeful
place. When I come to the end of my own
resources, God is still there, seeking to build something new and better. Jesus called it the kingdom of God, or the
reign of God, or God’s “empire.” It’s
hard to know how to translate it. The
writer of the Revelation calls it the New Jerusalem. That is what God is about. But first the ground must be cleared. The wrecking ball must swing. And then God will begin to build.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain
View, California, 94041, USA.