Honey from the Rock
Jeremiah 2:14-13
Proper 17C
September 1, 2013
Proper 17C
September 1, 2013
Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
We recognize that
the Bible is more for us than an ordinary book, that its words are read among
us with a certain authority and that, taken together, and in ways that while
neither simple nor direct nor even literal, they are nonetheless God’s word and
come to us as a gift. So I say, “The
word of God for the people of God” and ask you to reply, “Thanks be to
God.”
Sometimes it’s easy
to be thankful for the gift of a word from God.
At other times it’s harder. Sometimes
I’m surprised you don’t respond, “Thanks, but no thanks.” Today is one of those times and Jeremiah is
one of those readings. This is one of
those readings that give the Old Testament its reputation for being judgmental
and negative. This is one of those texts
that make some people say that the God of the Old Testament is a God of judgment
while the God of the New Testament is a God of love.
In my opinion those
who say that don’t know either the Old Testament or the New Testament well
enough. There is plenty of judgment in
the New Testament and plenty of love in the Old, but I’ll concede that this
text has plenty of wrath and not a whole of good news. I promise to bring us to get us there, but
first let’s listen to Jeremiah and try to understand where he’s coming from.
I confess that I
like Jeremiah. Without a doubt he’s my favorite
prophet. Some prophets—like II
Isaiah—get to share a lot of good news. They
are prophets of comfort and encouragement.
Other prophets are stuck with announcing bad news. Think, for example, of John the Baptist speaking
to the religious authorities who had come to the Jordan to see what the fuss
was about. John had no time for
them. “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to
come?” he cried. He seems to enjoy his
message a lot, maybe too much.
But Jeremiah is
stuck between his love for his people and God’s deep disappointment with
them. He delivers the message, but not
without his struggles. We overhear his
candid exchanges with God. We look over
his shoulder as his pen pours out his anguish.
God’s demand for justice and Jeremiah’s people’s consistent refusal to
act with justice are on a collision course.
Jeremiah can see the crash coming.
He does everything that he can think of to get Judah’s attention, to get
it to put on the brakes, but Judah does not respond. Judah has plugged up its ears. Judah’s theology has rendered it deaf to
Jeremiah’s pleading.
Judah has come to
believe its own press releases. Judah
presents itself as the great exception among all nations. It is a chosen people and a privileged
land. Yahweh, the true God, has made a
covenant with Judah that will last forever.
The people of Judah have inherited the land of Judah and it will be
theirs forever. The king of Judah has
been enthroned on Mount Zion and his throne will last forever. Yahweh has chosen the Temple as a dwelling
place and will defend it against every threat for all time.
For Yahweh to fail
to guarantee these things was unthinkable.
For Yahweh to abandon Judah, even temporarily, was impossible. Yahweh was their God. They were God’s people. Call it Judean exceptionalism.
The king had a
central place in this theology. He was a
descendant of David—yes, that David, the one with the slingshot. God had promised never to let David’s dynasty
fail. David’s heir could hardly
lose. This made him bold. God was not called the Yahweh of the Heaven
Forces for nothing.
The king also had
two direct lines to God. One was through
the temple. The king provided the temple and its staff with everything they
needed. In their turn the priests made
offerings and prayed on the king’s behalf.
The other line to God was the company of royal prophets. The king would consult them about policy
decisions. They would consult God and
then tell the king, “Yes, Yahweh is with you in all that you propose to do.”
In theory these
lines were supposed to keep the king’s actions in line with Yahweh’s will, but
in practice the king did what seemed good to him and the people around him all
agreed. In theory Judah should have done
what was right and just. In practice
Judah did whatever was good for Judah and called it right and just. Well, that’s not quite right. In reality what Judah did was mostly good for
Judah’s wealthy and powerful. And then,
after the decisions had been made, Judah’s relationship with Yahweh was used as
window dressing, as cover. Yahweh always
figured prominently in the king’s press releases. Every royal speech ended with “God bless you
and God bless the kingdom of Judah.”
I think the leaders
actually believed their own press. I
don’t think it was a cynical attempt to manipulate public opinion. I think they were sincere in their belief that
God would take care of Judah, its temple, its king and, of course, its
elite. They were sincere. They really believed that God would protect
them. Otherwise, we have to imagine that
they were so stupid as to believe that they could thumb their noses at the
Babylonians and get away with it. They
had fallen victim to their own spin doctors.
They were happy in their false confidence.
Jeremiah, on the
other hand, was not taken in. Jeremiah
saw past the names and the false assurances.
Jeremiah saw that, while the leaders of Judah talked about Yahweh a lot,
the god they talked about had very little in common with who Yahweh actually was. In reality, the god they were calling
Yahweh was a figment of their own imaginations, the projection of their own
ambitions. In short their version of
“Yahweh” was an idol. Why anyone who had
a real God would give that up for an imitation was something that Jeremiah
could not understand: “Has a nation switched gods, though they aren’t really gods
at all? Yet my people have exchanged
their glory for what has no value…They have forsaken me, the spring of living
water. And they have dug wells, broken
wells that can’t hold water.” But
whether he could understand it or not, Judah had done it, and Jeremiah could
see it.
And it tore at his
heart. I appreciate that. I get it.
Every parent who watches his grown child doing something foolish knows
this exasperated love. Every patriot who
sees her country making bad policy choices knows this devoted sorrow. Take Thomas Jefferson, for example, who wrote
in the context of slavery, “Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that
God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever…”[1]
Of course it is one
thing to notice the gap between our ideals and our practice and quite another
to bring the two together. I have had
more failure than success at closing that gap myself. Still, it is the role of a prophet to say
what she sees, even if she herself is among those accused.
On Wednesday last
week thousands gathered in our nation’s capital to remember the “March on
Washington for Jobs and Freedom” of 1963.
We remember it, of course, for the “I Have a Dream” speech of Martin
Luther King, Jr. We hear or read a few
lines of that speech and we are moved. But
something funny happens inside our heads and the image we see is of people
holding hands on a hilltop and singing a song which sounds more like an old
Coca-cola jingle than the spiritual “Free at Last.” The remembered version of King’s message has
been sanitized; it has become safe.
And so maybe we
don’t notice the yawning gaps. But they
are there. For the President, for
example, to interrupt his plans for attacking Syria to go to the Lincoln
Memorial, say some stirring words of his own, and go back to the White House to
continue his plans for war, betrays a failure to understand the core of King’s
message that real peace can never come from cruise missiles.
Tomorrow we will
celebrate Labor Day. Some will spend the
day in outdoor activities—and it does look like we’ll be blessed with another
day of nearly perfect weather. If
retailers have their way, we’ll spend it scooping up bargains.
But we observe Labor
Day in a nation that increasingly despises laborers. In 1963 they marched on Washington for jobs
as well as freedom. As King observed
that day, the freedom to sit at a lunch counter doesn’t mean much if you can’t
afford to buy a meal. Under the heading
of “jobs” they wanted “full employment,” job training programs that would
impart real, marketable skills and an increase in the minimum wage from $1.25
an hour to $2.00.[2]
Important things came from the March, but the jobs demands were not
met. Since then the lot of minimum wage
workers has declined. $1.25 in 1963
would be worth $9.54 today.[3]
$2.00 would be worth $15.27. Our
current minimum wage is $7.25, three-quarters of what the minimum wage from a
half century ago would be worth today. We
talk as if we honor labor, but we pay like we despise it.
It is the prophet’s
unenviable task to shine a light into the dark places of our world, into the
places where our practice contradicts our talk, the places where injustice is
done for the sake of expedience or ease, the places where we have “forsaken
springs of living water…[for] wells, broken wells that can’t hold water.”
Up to now it’s been
bad news, the bad news that our shared life falls short of what God requires
of—and hopes for—us. I promised you I
would get us to good news and I haven’t forgotten. In the first place, bad news isn’t an
entirely bad thing if it tells us the truth about ourselves. I’ve never seen real change start in any
other place than a painful truth reluctantly faced.
And that is the good
news—we do not have to remain in this stuck place. We can move, change, shift. Our encounter with a disappointed God is not
like a courtroom trial with a verdict followed by a sentence. Our encounter with God is a story. In this story God is not some sort of ideal, a
principle of justice or some such. In
this story God is a complex character. Yes,
God is passionately committed to justice.
Yes, the present arrangement of things runs afoul of God’s passionate
commitment. But God is more than willing
to forgive when we change our minds and change our ways. God is looking for an excuse to speak more
kindly.
I could show you the
places in Jeremiah where God does precisely that, but Psalm 81 is already
before us, so I’ll use it instead. In
Psalm 81, too, God has been disappointed in the covenant people. They have turned away from the God who had
delivered them from Egypt. So God had
turned away from them and let them “follow their own counsels,” do whatever
they want. But God’s hand is still
stretched out to them, still offering them a way to renew the covenant, to
begin again. If they will take God’s
hand, if they will change their minds and their ways, God will care for
them. They will eat the finest wheat, drenched
with honey from the rock. And they will
be satisfied. And so will we.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
[1]
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia in Paul Leicester Ford,
ed., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 4 (New York: G.P. Putnam's
Sons, 1892-99), page 232.
[2]
US Department of Labor, “History of Federal Minimum Wage Rates Under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, 1938 – 2009,” http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/chart.htm,
accessed: August 30, 2013.
[3]
Calculated using the calculator based on the Consumer Price Index found at: http://data.bls.gov/data/inflaction_calculator.htm.
No comments:
Post a Comment