A Strange Sort of King
Luke 23:33-43
Reign of Christ - C
November 24, 2013
Reign of Christ - C
November 24, 2013
Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
What a strange sort
of king this Jesus is! The symbol of his
office is not a crown or a scepter, but a brutal means of torture and
execution! This does not match any
notion of ours of what it might mean to be a king.
Not that we know
much of what it means to be a king. The
last king we saw around here was nobody special, at least not to look at him. That doesn’t really fit in with our idea of
what it means to be a king, either, if we think about it.
Diana, our
three-year-old granddaughter, knows exactly what it means to be royalty. It means dancing around her home wearing a
princess dress. And, of course, she
wears a tiara, because, really what’s the good of being a princess if you can’t
wear a tiara. That’s what princesses do
on her source for her ideas about being a princess, the television show Sophia
the First.
Of course, our modern
kings and queens are quite different from their ancient counterparts and from
the media-fueled fantasies of three-year-olds.
They reign, but do not rule, as the British say. They are sort of like flags, only they can
walk and talk. They are symbols of their
countries, roving representations with no real power. Real power is invested in parliaments that
are elected. There are a few of the
unlimited kind of kings still around but they are in places like Qatar and
Swaziland, so we don’t really have any experience of them. Absent any experience of our own we fill in
the blanks in our imagination from the legends of King Arthur, the fabrications
of the Walt Disney Company, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
We are inclined to
view kings through a romantic filter. A
real king with real power—of the sort that the ancient world knew—would not be
welcome. As Dennis in The Holy Grail
tells King Arthur who claims to rule by virtue of the sword Excalibur, given
him by the Lady of the Lake, “…strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords
is no basis for a system of government…you can't expect to wield supreme
executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you.” We might keep a king around for ceremonial
occasions, but the real thing? No, thank
you! We like our kings firmly controlled
by constitutions.
But in the ancient
world a king—with or without a sword thrown at him by a “watery tart”—was not
bound by any constitution. When it came
to his power over his people, he answered to no one but his own conscience—if
he had one—and from his decisions there was no appeal. The only limit on a king’s power in the
ancient Roman world was the emperor.
It was because Jesus
threatened the emperor’s power that Pontius Pilate murdered him. He did it casually and almost without
thought. But he did not do it carelessly. There was nothing careless about the
arrangement of Jesus’ death. Jesus was
crucified, a form of execution reserved for non-Roman rebels and traitors. The sign tacked up on his cross with its
inscription, “This is the king of the Jews,” was deliberate. The full weight of it doesn’t come across in
English. There was no word in Greek for
emperor. The emperor was known as basileus,
“king.” “This is the Emperor of the
Jews” was an insult both to Jews and to Jesus.
Emperor of the Jews? There is no
Jewish empire and there is no Jewish emperor!
And that was precisely the point of Pilate’s sarcastic mockery. Jesus’ claim is false and ridiculous.
So just what is
Jesus doing there, being executed on a cross?
It is not as if he didn’t know this was coming. Ever since his staged entrance into Jerusalem
at Passover, the Jewish freedom festival, with all the traditional Jewish
gestures of royalty, Jesus knew that the powers-that-be would have to
react. And he knew that they would react
violently. That’s how real kings react
to threats to their power. The first
rule of power is that if you do not use your power to protect your power you
will lose your power. Everyone knows
this. The Jewish leaders know this and
they scoff, “He saved others; let him save himself if he is the Messiah of God,
God’s chosen one.” The Roman soldiers
agree, “If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself!” So does one of the thieves, “Are you not the
Messiah? Save yourself and us!” Messiahs and kings act to save
themselves. Everybody knows this.
And yet Jesus does not
save himself. In fact, he is strangely
passive. Earlier, when he and his
disciples were going out to the Mount of Olives, he made sure that they had two
swords among them, but when an unnamed disciple used one of the swords, Jesus
rebuked him and healed the victim of his disciple’s violence by restoring the
ear that had been cut off. Jesus refused
to use the weapons that he had to resist those who came to arrest him.
Jesus is supposed to
be this dangerous revolutionary, but he doesn’t look or act very
dangerous. At every turn Jesus refused
to oppose Roman force with force of his own.
He did, in the words of one of the criminals crucified with him, nothing
wrong. But he was executed anyway.
The Romans were a
violent and brutal regime, but they claimed to be doing justice. They claimed to be doing only what they had
to do to keep order and establish peace.
Like every bully in history, they blamed their victims. When Jesus goaded them into a violent
reaction without himself giving in to violence, he unmasked the Roman
regime. He stripped away their
pretensions to be doing justice. The
Romans were not interested in justice; they were interested in power. They had no divine claim to rule the
world. They didn’t rule the world by
right. They were just bigger and meaner
than their neighbors and willing to bully them into obedience.
Here is the double
irony of the cross. While it appears
that Jesus is at the mercy of the Romans, in fact they fail to make him play
their game. They can strip away his
garments, but they cannot strip him of his integrity. They can kill him, but they cannot force him
to give up his humanity. The crucifixion
was supposed to be a demonstration of Jesus’ weakness, hence the irony of
labeling as the Jewish emperor. The
double irony is that, instead, the cross became a demonstration of Roman
weakness and of the illegitimacy of the Roman emperor.
If Jesus had opposed
Roman violence with violence of his own, the Romans could simply have said, as
they said so many times about rebels and thieves, “You see, we are simply
protecting the public good, establishing and maintaining order.” But when they use violence to silence awkward
questions and dissenting voices, they show how threatened they are. Once Jesus decided to commit himself utterly
to the Reign of God, Pilate could no longer control him. From that moment on, Jesus reigns and rules, even
if his throne is the ancient equivalent of an electric chair.
Jesus has a
different idea about power than Pilate. “The
kings of the Gentiles lord it over them,” Jesus told his disciples, “and those
in authority over them are called benefactors.
But not so with you; rather the greatest among you must become like the
youngest, and the leader like one who serves.”
Jesus has a
different idea about power and that is because he has a different idea about
God. Pilate is expecting God to act like
a king. Pilate is expecting a bigger
version of himself. Pilate is expecting
to find God in halls of power, in the Roman forum, in the Oval Office, in the
Kremlin. But that’s not where God
chooses to be.
God is not the one
who stands behind kings and keeps them in power. The reign of God isn’t coming with invading
armies or a coup d’état. The reign of
God will not come by a decision of the Council of Bishops.
God chooses to be
with the one on the cross. And the one
on the cross chooses to be with his society’s outcasts, misfits and
rejects. God’s power is at loose in the
world in the least likely places and among the least likely people. On the festival of the Reign of Christ we
remember the king whose throne is a cross and who takes the side of the weak, the
king who turns kingship upside down.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment