Ripping Off Widows
Fourth
Sunday in Lent
Mark 12:28-44
March 6, 2016
Mark 12:28-44
March 6, 2016
Rev. John M.
Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
Jesus
talked about a lot of things. He talked about anger and conflict. He
talked about love, but not the romantic kind. He talked a great deal
about politics, not in the partisan sense, but in the sense of power,
and who has it and how they use it. He talked about sex hardly at
all, which you would never know to listen to some people tell it. He
talked about family life and mostly he was against it.
He
talked about a lot of things, but one of his favorite subjects was
money. This comes as an unpleasant surprise to some folks. Most of us
think that a once-a-year sermon on money at stewardship campaign time
is more than enough. Folks who complain about how often we talk about
money don't know the half of it. Of the many failings of modern
preaching one of the most prominent is that we preachers talk far
less about money than Jesus did.
And
when we do talk about money we almost always do it in the context of
what we call "stewardship." We say stewardship when mostly
we mean fund-raising, a necessary but different thing. But when Jesus
talked about money, he never meant fund-raising, ever. In Jesus' day
our movement didn't have buildings and paid staff and the only time
in the New Testament that fund-raising is mentioned it was for famine
relief in Jerusalem so that Paul could prove that Gentile Christians
were just as good as Jewish Christians.
When
we've needed to preach a fund-raising sermon, we press stories about
other things into service instead. Take this chestnut of a text, a
story called "The Widow's Mite." "The widows might
what?" No, the widow's mite. The smallest coin in circulation in
ancient Palestine was the copper lepton. Two lepta were worth a Roman
quadrans which was the least valuable Roman coin. And since a "myte"
was the smallest coin in England when King James commissioned a new
translation of the Bible, that word was pressed into service as a
translation for lepton. The point is that the "mite" was
worth very little.
Jesus
and his disciples were hanging out in the Temple courtyard in
Jerusalem. Jesus was watching people put their offerings into the
Temple treasury collection box when a "poor widow" put in
two of those little copper coins, two leptra. Jesus pointed her out
to his disciples. The rich had put in some of their "walking
around" money, but the poor widow had turned over her whole
living. She had counter-signed her Social Security check and put it
in the offering box. They gave what they could easily spare out of
their abundance and she gave everything she had. So by Jesus'
mathematics— which is not taught in accounting schools— she had
given more than they had.
So
we preachers have seized on this story and we bring it out every fall
as a way of saying that every little counts to those who can't afford
much. We don't say so, you know, but we know very well that reading
the story this way shames those who could give more so maybe they
will give more.
But
it's not stewardship campaign time. I'm not under any instruction to
raise funds with this particular sermon, though as a rule we do
accept donations.
So
I'm free to tell you that, although this is a story about
fund-raising, it is not a fund-raising story. I'm also free to go
where the story sends me. And I'm free to notice the context, the
parts that come before and after the story of the widow. I'm free to
stand where the story invites me to stand and see what the story
invites me to see.
What
I see first of all is that before we get to the story, Jesus has been
in a long dispute with the Temple worthies. They try to trap him with
questions, but he slips through their nets. He finishes the series by
going on the offensive. Jesus attacks the scribes for their large
egos. They like to be treated with respect in public; they say long
prayers to look good; and they expect places of honor when the
synagogue meets or they are invited to a dinner party.
They
also exploit widows. Widows, as you remember, along with orphans and
foreign workers, are the groups that ancient Israel considered to be
especially vulnerable. Widows, orphans, and guest workers were
isolated in a world where being alone was the next step from death,
not just socially, but often quite literally. It was for this reason
that God takes their treatment seriously and personally.
I
know I hate it when I hear of some new scam that exploits the
vulnerable. It's still too often the older folks among us, too often
literally widows who are taken advantage of in this way. A Bernie
Madoff builds a Ponzi scheme on retirement investments, or roofing
companies take down payments and then skip town, or people posing as
IRS agents offer to settle a tax debt for pennies on the dollar. All
they need is your checking account number. They all get my blood
boiling. If it were up to me I would smear them with honey and stake
them out on a hill of fire ants. So it's probably a good thing it
isn't up to me.
And
here, according to Jesus' accusation, we have people who make their
living telling people what the Covenant of Yahweh means— the
covenant that demands the protection of widows, orphans, and guest
workers— who are themselves the exploiters of the vulnerable,
widows included. They figure out ways to separate widows from their
precarious livings and then parade their own piety on the street
corners.
This
widow is a case in point!
While
it is true that, if generosity is measured by what we give in
comparison to what we can afford to give, the widow has a virtue few
if any of us can match. But Jesus pointed her out, not as an
illustration of generosity, but as an illustration of the hypocrisy
of the scribes and an example of their flagrant disregard for justice
and the covenant's demands. I don't think Jesus pointed her out
because he admired her, although he may well have. I think Jesus
pointed her out because he was disgusted by the way the Temple was
abusing her piety and taking advantage of her.
Anyway,
he seems to have had enough for the day. He and the disciples left
the Temple. As they were going out, the disciples like a bunch of
tourists were gaping at the architecture. That was the frosting on
the cake. Wouldn't the Temple be more beautiful if it were a place
where widows were protected and orphans were cared for and guest
workers were treated fairly? Wouldn't that more than compensate for
the slight loss of income and the slightly reduced operating budget
for the Temple?
"You
see these great buildings?" Jesus asked his disciples. "Not
one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down."
The Temple will be destroyed for the crimes that were committed there
and the pride and hypocrisy of its leaders. Maybe honey and fire ants
are in order, after all.
Fund-seeking
preachers have turned this into a story about the wonderful piety of
the poor widow when they should have noticed that Jesus underscored
her actions as an indictment of the fund-raising efforts of the
Temple and of the system of which it was the symbolic center. If
anything, they should have been giving her money, not the other way
around.
The
whole of this text makes clear what generations of Consecration
Sunday sermons have not: A society that requires that the poor become
poorer so the rich can become richer lives on borrowed time and under
the shadow of an impending doom. Any society founded on injustice
builds fine monuments to its own glory upon a fault line so deep, so
severe, so unstable, that not one stone will be left upon another.
Justice
is a finer ornament than any amount of gold leaf. Mercy makes for
better architecture than towers of glass and steel. Protecting the
vulnerable from the rapacious rich provides better security than any
amount of electronic surveillance. It is not too late to turn
ourselves and to begin to turn the world toward these things.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a
copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment