That's How the Light Gets In
Festival
of the Resurrection
Luke 24:1-12
April 16, 2017
Luke 24:1-12
April 16, 2017
Rev.
John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
If
you were here last Easter--or pretty much any Easter--you would have
heard me say, "Of course I believe in the resurrection of the
dead. I'm a Cubs fan!" See? See? What did I tell you?
There
are glimpses of resurrection--of new life--all around us. And not
just in the return of a once great baseball club to the winner's
circle after a long drought. In the Northern Hemisphere Easter lines
up with spring. Even the word Easter itself is simply borrowed from
the name of the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre
for whom the month that we call April was named. The only thing we
know for certain about her comes from the Anglo-Saxon historian known
as Bede the Venerable who wrote in The
Reckoning of Time,
Eosturmonath
has a name which is now translated "Paschal month", and
which was once called after a goddess of theirs named Eostre,
in whose honour feasts were celebrated in that month. Now they
designate that Paschal season by her name, calling the joys of the
new rite by the time-honoured name of the old observance.1
I
suspect she may have been a fertility goddess of some kind, but Bede
doesn't say so. Whether I am right or not, the signs of renewed life
around us seem to resonate with the theme of resurrection. My grass,
which badly needed mowing last fall when I ran out of ambition, has
come back fresh and green and is, even as I speak, laughing
at me and
my plans to keep it under control. Birds that have been absent over
the winter have returned. Trees
have a green cloud around them, a hint that leaves will soon unfold.
Decorah's bald eagle chicks are once again the wobbly stars of the
Internet. Pasty-skinned Decorans have emerged from their winter
shelters, into the bright spring sunlight, blinking and shading their
eyes, grateful to have survived another winter. This is the sort of
resurrection with a small "r" that we look for in the
spring.
There
are other, less seasonal, resurrections with a small "r" as
well. Part of our life might be an annual round of tests and an
appointment with our oncologist to review them. It's just part of the
regime of watchfulness that every cancer survivor knows. Our doctor
tells us that the tests show no sign of cancer's return and we didn't
realize that we hadn't been breathing, not really breathing, until
the news sinks in and we are suddenly more alive than we had expected
to be. That's resurrection with a little "r".
Or
we have buried a spouse. The death was foreseen, but still a shock,
and we have never been in such pain. We knew that our life was ended
and yet, somehow, we kept living. A year or more later we are
surprised when we have days with no tears, days with a little joy
even, and we discover that having grief as a companion is not
incompatible with resurrection with a small "r".
But
these resurrections with a small "r" are not quite what we
are talking about on Easter morning. Some of these are expressions of
the changing seasons. Our anxiety over the coming of winter is eased
by our experience that winter is followed by spring. We are upheld in
our grief, at least a little, by the knowledge that other people have
survived the experience. Good Friday and Holy Saturday have been
followed by Easter and Easter, at least an Easter with a small "e"
can be expected.
But
there are some experiences of Good Friday, some experiences of Holy
Saturday, for which there is no guarantee of Easter. Eleven days ago
a woman who called herself Om Ahmed, a woman from the town of Khan
Sheikhoun in
Syria where
poison gas killed about eighty people, had this to say to a reporter
for the Washington
Post:
If
the world wanted to stop this they would have done so by now. One
more chemical attack in a town the world hasn’t heard of won’t
change anything. I’m sorry, my son died yesterday. I have nothing
left to say to the world.2
This
is what Holy Saturday looks like when there is no promise of Easter.
And
what will
become of
the signs of spring when there is no longer any winter to speak of?
When apple trees bloom in February? When polar bears can no longer
swim from maternity dens on land to the edge of the pack ice where
the seals they feed on live? Can we still speak of the cycle of the
seasons when the cycles have spun out of control?
This
is what Holy Saturday looks like when there is no promise of Easter.
I
know it's Easter and you did not come here to hear how badly we are
doing. you
came to hear reassurance and hope. I don't have much hope myself. I
have none at all, if hope is confused with optimism, for I am not at
all optimistic. We are taking a shrinking window of opportunity and
gleefully giving it away to the extractors of oil and coal so that
they can show a profit for a few more quarters, no matter what the
cost to everyone else in
the long run.
The day is coming when I will have to say to my granddaughter and
grandsons, "I did what I thought I could. It wasn't enough. I am
sorry." This is what Holy Saturday looks like when there is no
promise of Easter.
So
what do we do when it is Holy Saturday and there is no promise of
Easter? Perhaps
we bury the dead like the
women in
Luke 24. That work
had
been interrupted
by the sabbath sunset. They went back
to
the tomb with
the burial spices they needed and,
oddly, found the
tomb open,
the stone rolled away. Entering the tomb, they saw what Laura Arnold
describes as two "glowy" people, but of Jesus there was no
sign. I don't know how you typically react when you see glowy people,
but the women were frightened and they fell on their knees and bowed
down with their faces on the ground. The glowy people--men, the text
says, but how can you really tell when they are glowing?--asked what
is perhaps the oddest question in the entire Bible: "Why do you
seek the living among the dead?" Well, because, we were looking
for a dead person? But of course, once reminded of it, they
remembered that Jesus had said something about being raised, though
what he had meant they didn't know. After all, Jesus often said
important
things that
made little sense to them.
They
had come to the tomb to complete the death and life cycle. There were
things that had to be done for the dead body of Jesus, important
things, things required by their tradition so that his death would
make as much sense as it was ever going to. But their intentions were
thwarted, their plans set aside, the smooth progressing of the cycle
interrupted. And then they heard strange things from two glowy
people, things about Jesus having been raised. To say that there were
cracks in their understanding of the world and the way that it works
would be to greatly underestimate their shock.
They
went to tell the men what had happened. The men didn't believe them.
Well, at least that
hadn't changed. Peter didn't believe them, either, but still ran to
the tomb to see for himself. There was nothing to see. Just a linen
cloth. So he left, "wondering what had happened."
At
this point on Easter morning we have the testimony of two glowy
people that Jesus is alive. We have Jesus' hints about what would
happen after he was killed. But all any of us really know--the
women
included--is that the body is missing.
It
is possible that nothing in the world has changed at all. That
violence still trumps justice. That death is still the last answer,
to every question. That Jesus is really and completely dead. In which
case, there is no space for the dream that Jesus cultivated among us
to take root and grow into reality. When
we started we
still thought the world could change. Now we know better. Now we know
that no other reality is possible.
But
something has
changed. There is a crack in what had seemed to be reality. There is
the slightest shift. It's only a shift in the imagination. It's only
a few questions at this point. Is Jesus still dead? Does violence
always win? Does death have the last word? Are the glowy people
right? It's only the slightest shift, but there is now a space in
theimagination to think and feel the world otherwise. There is room
for a different possibility than the one that claims to be reality to
take root and grow and maybe even bear fruit.
Every
revolution
begins in the imagination and it begins the same way that Easter did,
with little cracks in the brittle certainties that convince us that
the Romans have won and Jesus will stay dead, that there is no future
for the polar bear, and that the death of Om Ahmed's son is
meaningless.
What
we have in the story of the women, the glowy people, and Peter, and
perhaps the best we can do right now is not exactly hope. It is the
place just beyond the
place where optimism died. It
is the place in the imagination where something is working otherwise
to reality. It is the place where the smugness
of
the powers that be is
confronted
with something that doesn't quite fit. There is a new reality coming
into being. It is fuzzy still; its outlines are not yet clear.
Like
the women we can only say what we have seen and heard. Like Peter we
still wonder what happened. But that might be enough for now. That
might be enough for us to stop taking as gospel the thin stories of
our days, the stories about the usefulness of violence, the
untrustworthiness of our neighbors, and the consummate value of being
comfortable. That little piece that doesn't fit just might be enough
for us to distrust the lies of the advertisers and the politicians
and even the lies that we tell ourselves to explain to ourselves why
it is we can’t change things.
It's
not quite hope, but it is the place where hope might emerge, hope
that would let us say, Christ is risen indeed! Alleluia! Now that
would be resurrection with a big “R”.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a
copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.
1 The
Venerable Bede, De
ratione temporum
(The
Reckoning of Time,
trans. Faith Wallis, Liverpool University Press, 1988, pp. 55), 15.
2 Louisa
Loveluck and Zakaria Zakaria, “World Health Organization: Syria
Chemical Attack Likely Involved Nerve Agent,” Washington Post,
April 5, 2017,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/russia-blames-syrian-rebels-for-devastating-chemical-attack-in-northern-town/2017/04/05/ba173c76-196a-11e7-8598-9a99da559f9e_story.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment