Credo: Who Is God?
4th
Sunday after Pentecost
Exodus 3:1-15
June 17, 2018
Exodus 3:1-15
June 17, 2018
Rev.
John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
Who
is God? Now there's
an ambitious question! Maybe I would have been better off to have
asked the question next week with everything packed, my car running,
ready to hotfoot it out of town before you had a chance to ask any
questions.
How
to begin...
I
can say that my earlier attempts to find an answer to that question
mostly involved what we in the "biz" call "doing
theology." Part of the reason for requiring a seminary education
for clergy is to train clergy as theologians, or at least to make a
beginning. We were subjected to various courses in theology that
broke it down into its parts: Christology, ecclesiology, soteriology,
eschatology, pneumatology, anthropology, and theology proper.
Theology also got smuggled into courses on Church history, which was
framed as a series of controversies, a series of heresies that were
battled and defeated (sometimes in literal battles). We learned the
general shape of what is acceptable and what is not in Christian
thought. We learned about current schools of theological thinking. We
found our favorite authors and stuck with them, defending them
against all comers.
My
mind and personality are suited to this sort of thing, so you can
imagine that I did it pretty well. I still do.
But
as comfortable and familiar as this path is to me, it has its limits.
One of those limits is that doing theology is a matter of
abstraction. We might start with the Bible, or, more accurately a
small selection of texts from the Bible, and we make general
statements about them. We move from the specific to the general. And
this applies to the stuff of our lives as well as the stuff of the
Bible. Take Karl Barth, one of the more famous theologians of the
last century. You can read all thirty-one volumes of his Church
Dogmatics
and never discover what sort of a marriage he had or whether he liked
children.
Theology
may tell us about what
God is and what God is not, but surprisingly tells us little about
who
God is. Theology can satisfy us intellectually and still leave us
wanting something else.
So
I'm not sure I'm even qualified to ask the question. Moses
asked the question. He wanted to know God's name, something more than
"the God of your ancestors, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob."
Moses
wants a name
to give to the Israelites. He knows they will ask. And I suspect he
knows why
they will ask. Names are like handles that can be used to gain power.
In some places in the world, no one's true name is ever uttered out
loud. Instead they goes by a nickname, sometimes obscene, always an
insult. In that way they are protected from spirits who would use the
knowledge of their name to do them harm. Even we, if we are in a
conversation in which someone knows our name, but we do not know
theirs, feel ourselves at a disadvantage, as if we have given someone
else power over us.
So
Moses asked, "What is your name?" And God replied,
"אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה
אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה,"
which translates to "I am what I am" or "I am who I
am."
Traditionally,
philosophically-minded theologians have interpreted this as meaning
something like, "the One who has no source of existence beyond
itself," or "the One who is not dependent on anyone else,"
or "the self-existent One." I can't blame theologians for
this. Like the rest of us they are just trying to understand. They
are just trying to get a handle on God. And that may be the problem,
the same problem that the Israelites had. They
are trying to get a handle on God, too. But God does not wish to be
handled.
And
that's why I
think God
response
is something
along these lines: "When the Israelites demand to know my name,
tell them, 'You think you'll have some sort of leverage over me if
you know my name? Well, nevermind what my name is! It's none of your
business what my name is!' Tell them Nevermind sent you!"
What
if I tried--what if we tried--living into the question of who God is
without being motivated by any attempt to get a handle on God, but
simply to know even as we are known, as Paul put it.
In
the last few years I have found myself more and more wandering along
the winding and criss-crossing paths of the Bible itself. There are,
I testify, wonders to be seen. And in the dazzling details I glimpse
hints, if not of God's name, then at least of who God might be known
to be.
There
is, of course, the next verse, the one after the one in which God
skates around the question of God's name, the one in which God tells
Moses God's name: "The Lord [that is, Yahweh], the God of your
ancestors, Abraham's God, Isaac's God, and Jacob's God." Yahweh
might be related in some way to the Hebrew for "I am." So
something odd has happened, which to say the very least, is not at
all unusual in the Bible. In one breath God has said in effect, I'm
not going to tell you my name. In the very next God says, Oh, by the
way, my name is Yahweh. But that isn't where I went in pursuit of an
answer to the question of who God is.
Where
I went is this: We are used to thinking about God in the declarative
sentences and philosophical propositions of the theologians. We don't
necessary know the lingo, but we think that this is how it ought to
be done. But the Bible doesn't present God very often as the object
of theology. Instead the Bible presents God as a character in a
story. In fact the Bible presents God as the leading character in the
story that it contains.
In
the story I've chosen for today's text we have, in a way, God's
self-introduction to the Israelites after a considerable period of
absence. The absence is not explained. It's just there. Abraham had a
God. Isaac had a God. Jacob had a God. Joseph and his brothers had a
God, the same God as their father, grandfather, and great
grandfather. In that story Joseph and his brothers God
arranged for them to settle in
Egypt as guests of Pharaoh and so escaped a regional famine.
But
then God seems to have disappeared. A different Pharaoh emerges, one
who didn't know Joseph or his brothers, one for whom the Israelites
were just a subject people the labor of whose bodies could be
commodified and exploited. Pharaoh enslaved them. But God is absent.
God even disappeared from the memory of the Israelites; they have
forgotten. They have become just another band of miserable slaves.
When they cry out, they don't even have an address toward which to
direct their prayers.
But
that doesn't seem to matter to God. Whatever God's absence meant, it
had not
meant that God had ceased to notice what happened to the Israelites.
As God said to Moses, "I’ve clearly seen my people oppressed
in Egypt. I’ve heard their cry of injustice because of their slave
masters. I know about their pain."
There
is more. Not only has God noticed, God is now on the scene to deliver
the Israelites. God has not forgotten the covenant that even Israel
can no longer remember.
"I’ve
come down to rescue them from the Egyptians in order to take them
out of that land and bring them to a good and broad land, a land
that’s full of milk and honey, a place where the Canaanites, the
Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
Jebusites all live. Now the Israelites’ cries of injustice have
reached me. I’ve seen just how much the Egyptians have oppressed
them."
God
has seen, God has heard, God knows, God has come down to deliver, God
has come to bring them to a good land.
In
the story, we know God as one who sees, who hears, who pities, and
who comes down to save. It's a story to be sure. We could say that
it's just
a story, only
a story. We could say that, except that, since we
are Jesus-followers,
we are part of that "just a story." We are on the inside of
the story. We are characters in this story in which God is also a
character. Inside this story we can never be sure that God will not
see. We cannot rule out the possibility that God will hear. We cannot
categorically state that God does not pity the oppressed. And so we
cannot ignore the possibility that God will come down to save.
Does
this answer the question of who God is? Will you accuse me of a
sleight of hand if I say, Yes, it does? I haven't proven anything,
even that God exists. But if this story is any
part of our story, then that changes things.
We
don't know that God will act
this way in similar circumstances. But
God has done it before. So neither can we know that God will not act
in these ways again. We
hope that God will, because
there are people who are being oppressed now,
people who have fallen into Pharaoh's hands, people who had fled
life-threatening conditions in their home for the hope of refuge in
another land and who have been denied that hope. But not simply
denied it. They have been arrested and charged with
crimes. And
if that were not bad enough, their children have been taken from
them, two thousand or more of them taken and held hostage. Pharaoh
has never dared to be so callous and cruel and cold.
But
this is acceptable because Pharaoh has decreed it. Pharaoh imagines
that there is no higher authority who can disagree. Pharaoh even
imagines that he may invoke God as the authority behind his decree.
Pharaoh imagines that he can carry out a cruel and callous policy and
claim that he ought to be obeyed because God says so. I don't know
what story Pharaoh thinks he's in. But it's not our
story.
In
our story there is One who notices such things, and who has a record
of responding savingly and
sometimes savagely. for
the sake of two thousand underage hostages. The God of Abraham cannot
be counted on to be absent. When the God of Abraham is present, the
oppressed go free and the oppressors answer for their crimes. And
that's my answer to the question. This is Who
God Is.
If
Pharaoh is sleeping well these days, it's only because he doesn't
understand the situation.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a
copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment