On (Not) Taking an Incomplete
Philippians 1:3-11
Advent 2C
December 9, 2012
Advent 2C
December 9, 2012
Rev. John M.
Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
I took an
unconscionable length of time to write my doctoral dissertation. I kept applying for—and getting—extensions and
the time went on and on. For several
years I was a kind of departmental old-timer.
I think that’s why new graduate students in my department would ask me
for advice. I regard this as strange
because the longer I stayed around the less qualified I was to give
advice. But I would try anyway.
I would say, “When
you use any kind of source material, make sure that you record all of
the bibliographical information so that you don’t have to make a late-night
dash to the library to find the source again and get a page number or a
publisher.” That was good advice at the
time, although most of the time the advice-seeker was looking for something
more cerebral and less practical. And
anyway, the advice is out of date now. Today’s
students use on-line sources so much that they aren’t really sure where
physical books or journals might be or what they might be useful for. And they have software to extract publication
data and plug it into footnotes and bibliographies.
Other advice has
stood the test of time a little better. I
would advise new students when making notes about sources to use to make a note
about why they thought a source might be useful. It’s a frustrating experience to be staring
at a reference to a book or journal article, to know that it must have seemed
important enough to write down at some time, but to have no idea of why you had
done it.
And perhaps the best
of all: Don’t take incompletes. By the
time students get to graduate school, they are presumed to have good—or at
least—better judgment than college students.
The rules allow for more flexibility.
Getting an incomplete, for example, was pretty easy. If you said you needed to take an incomplete,
professors signed off on them and the department generally approved. This, however, is a trap. I saw students accumulating incompletes faster
than student loan debt. When the
incompletes came due they were in a bind: having never actually done a
semester’s worth of a work in a semester, they were not prepared to do two
semesters’ worth in the same amount of time.
But taking an
incomplete is pretty tempting when the papers are all due and the time you
spent with your colleagues in the grad student watering hole complaining about
your heavy work load (rather than actually getting it done) caught up with you
at the end of the term. It’s a pretty
easy pattern to fall into, a human pattern.
It can be a mindset.
A friend of my sister says about term
papers, “There are some research papers that you abandon rather than
finishing.” The deadline comes and you
hand it in and hope that it is good enough.
I hesitate to confess how often that is true of sermons as well. Whatever good intentions I had during the
week for close reading and careful crafting of the sermon must be set aside in
favor of finishing something sometime before Sunday morning. I can only hope that my efforts are good
enough often enough.
“Good enough” and
“close enough” are phrases that come into play all too often. I am comforted a little at least that my
profession isn’t the only one that succumbs to the temptation to settle. “If it doesn’t fit, get a bigger hammer,” is
a saying that shows there are others who find themselves in a similar place.
How often do we give
up “excellent” because “good enough” lies so readily to hand and we are under a
deadline?
The season of
advent, though, reminds us that there is one place where good enough simply not
good enough, where only the perfect will do.
Advent reminds us—and it’s good that it does so at the beginning of the
church year—that we who are a part of God’s covenant people are caught up in
God’s enterprise. God has plans that we
did not make. God has purposes that we
did not choose. And in these plans and
in these purposes the phrase “good enough” does not figure.
God has in mind to
finish the work of creation. In our
gospel text from last week this work of creation was seen on a cosmic
scale. We had promises of mayhem to come
as the stars, the sun, the moon and the earth are all shaken as the forces of
chaos that had been confined at creation are let loose. We may have found this quaintly primitive or
profoundly disturbing. Whether the one
or the other, though, we know that the first step in remodeling is demolition, whether
it’s being done in the kitchen or the whole cosmos.
But this week the
scale shifts and the reading addresses us and our lives and what God’s plans
and purposes for us may be. Our reading
from Philippians lacks detail, but it doesn’t really need it. If we’ve been paying attention for the
2011-12 church year we might have noticed that God’s purposes for us and for
our lives have been spelled out a little at a time in each week’s lessons. If you missed it, don’t worry, the weekly
lessons in the 2012-13 church year will do the same thing.
Paul’s letter to the
few dozen households who were the Christian community in Philippi begins—as
they all do—with his greeting and then it launches into the prayer that is our
reading for today. I know, it doesn’t
sound much like a prayer. It doesn’t
start with “Dear God” and it doesn’t end with “in Jesus’ name. Amen” but it’s a prayer nonetheless. The clues are the phrases “I thank my God…” and
then “And my prayer is this, that…” And
what is Paul’s prayer? For what does he
give thanks and for what does he pray?
Paul gives thanks
because the Philippians have a share in the ministry of good news. They have been caught up, like we have, into
God’s plans and purposes for our world. God’s
work has begun in them as it has in us.
But wait, there’s
more: Paul gives thanks because it doesn’t stop there. We are works in progress. God continues to work in us. Furthermore, God will keep renewing, refashioning,
redeeming, and restoring us until we are finished. God will keep working until we are
completed. God will not rest with a
creation that is half-finished and God will not quit with us still incomplete.
That’s why Paul
gives thanks.
Based on those facts
in our case, Paul goes on to pray for us in slightly more detail—not too much
detail, but slightly more. The purposes
that Paul believes are God’s purposes in us and therefore the purposes he will
support in prayer have to do first of all with love that grows and grows and
second with the kind of knowledge that comes from experience. These things will yield “a harvest of
justice.” All together they will render
us pure and blameless. How’s that for
high hopes?
God’s ambition for
us goes beyond our being a people who are “mostly good” and “pretty nice” all
the way to pure and blameless. Not, of
course, that there is anything wrong with being mostly good and pretty
nice. The world could use a lot more of
mostly good and pretty nice. But God
does not intend to settle for that. God
wants love that continues to grow, the knowledge that comes with experience, a
harvest of justice, purity and spotlessness.
And until God fashions all of those in us, God’s work in us will not be
done.
I know that not many
of you grew up in churches in the United Methodist family tree. You may not have heard much about the founder
of our tradition, John Wesley. I grew up
as a Methodist and then a United Methodist, and I didn’t learn much about him
either, so you’re in good company.
John Wesley spoke
and wrote about “going on to perfection.”
He had this notion that, given God’s love and God’s grace, there was no
reason why we should not be able to love with perfect love in this
lifetime. John Wesley never claimed to
be perfect in love himself, but argued that it was possible. And if it is possible, then this should be
something that we strive toward.
Some of
you may remember Bishop Clymer. Bishop
Clymer ordained me as a deacon, which used to be a step along the way from
being a lay person to being an elder. Bishop
Clymer met with all of us who were being ordained as deacons that year for a
conversation. He went over some of the
questions that we would be asked. Two of
them had to do with this strange Wesleyan notion of Christian perfection: “Are you going on to perfection?” and “Do you expect to be made perfect in this
life?” The answers to both of those
questions needed to be “yes.” He knew
that these were pretty bold claims to make and that some of us at least would
be reluctant to answer “yes” without feeling that we were overreaching
ourselves by more than a little. Bishop
Clymer said, “If you’re not going on to perfection, tell me, what is it you’re
going on to?”
And that’s the
question that’s being posed to us in the reading from Paul’s letter to the
Philippians. “Are we willing to commit
ourselves to journeying toward a perfect love?”
That question and this, “Are we willing to trust that God will get us
there when our own power is not enough?”
If I am reading Philippians rightly, God is not willing to take an
incomplete.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment