A Blood-Thirsty God
2nd Sunday after
Pentecost (Proper 8A)
Genesis 22:1-14
June 26, 2011
Genesis 22:1-14
June 26, 2011
Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, Iowa
Like a lot of congregations, we
give Bibles to our third-graders. It’s a
highly questionable practice. The only
thing that lets us get away with it is the assurance that our children won’t read
them. Otherwise, what are we doing
giving an R-rated book to eight year olds?
We want our children revere the
Bible, but we’d rather they not actually read it. Oh, some of it is okay. They can read some of the psalms, and the
Sermon on the Mount, the Love Chapter from 1 Corinthians, and maybe the
creation stories. Those are okay. Other parts are sleep-inducing and harmless
enough. But then there are what Phyllis
Trible calls “texts of terror.” This is one of them.
We’d like to dodge stories like
this one, but I won’t let us do that. This
is our book. These are our stories. We don’t have to like them, but we do have to
reckon with them. So reckon with them we
will. And we’re not going to permit
ourselves the sugar-coating and evasions that usually go with the story. No, let’s look it straight in the eye.
So let’s begin by
setting aside the notion that, since God was only testing Abraham, somehow
that makes everything okay. The narrator tells us that God set out
to test Abraham, but Abraham knew nothing of this. All Abraham knew was that he was summoned:
“Abraham!” And he had to answer.
So that’s how this
story begins. God has the upper
hand. And Abraham knows it.
“Take your son, your
only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him
there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains that I shall show you,” God
said.
Abraham was new in
the covenant people business and did not have a tradition to draw on for
understanding the sorts of things God would ask. There were no seminaries filled with scholars
writing books of systematic theology that would help Abraham sort things
out. There was only the Voice who had
promised an inheritance and a son to inherit it, the miracle son born to Sarah
and Abraham in their old age.
Abraham did not know
and could not know whether this demand was in or out of character for God. There was only the Voice and its demand. We do not know, but we can imagine, what went
through Abraham’s mind as he gathered what would be necessary for the sacrifice
and for the journey. What did he tell
Sarah?
What blackness was
in his heart as they trudged to Moriah, Isaac carrying the wood, and he the
fire and the knife?
What was in Abraham’s
heart as Isaac innocently asked, “Where is the lamb?” and he replied with an
answer with a double meaning, “God will provide”? He avoided saying the obvious—“You are the
lamb for sacrifice that God has already provided.” Was his use of the future tense—God will provide—a
sort of prayer, a reminder to God that there was still time to make a substitute? But God was silent as Abraham walked with his
son, his only son Isaac, the son whom he loved.
Abraham went about
the preparation of the altar, piling the stones, laying the wood, binding his
son and readying the knife. And still God
was silent.
What was in God’s
heart as Abraham obeyed God’s summons? We
do not know. Did God expect that Abraham
would resist this insanity, this inhumane demand? After all, Abraham had resisted God’s plan to
destroy Sodom and Gomorrah and Abraham’s argument then had been precisely that
innocent blood should not be spilled—even by God—not even in the name of
justice. But if God was surprised, there
is no hint of it in the story.
So there they were—a
stubborn old man and his stubborn God—at the edge of a moral abyss.
Abraham reached out
his hand to kill his son, his only son Isaac, whom he loved, and God
blinked. Someone had to. Someone had to call off this terrible game of
chicken. This, after all, was not simply
a test of Abraham. It was also a test of
God, of God’s nature and character. What
sort of God is God? Is God a God of
justice and mercy? Or is God a God of
violence and bloodshed? Does God value
life? Or does God value death?
Abraham passed the
test, but God struggled with his part,at least at first.
Sometimes our lives
take us through very hard places. We
don’t need for God to play games with us by setting up any other tests than
what reality throws at us. Reality is already
hard enough. God seems to get this. He doesn’t do this again. Not after the fiasco at Moriah.
I will pass over
what this episode must have cost Isaac who is thrown into a story of madness
and menace as God and his father play a game of chicken with his life at
stake. I’ll also pass over the hapless
ram who had been minding its own business, doing whatever it is that rams do when
they’re not being sacrificed—maybe he was on his way to see that cute ewe in
the next valley—when he found himself hopelessly tangled in brambles, then
rescued by Abraham, then tied up and killed as the “happy” ending to someone
else’s story.
I’ll pass over these
things except to observe that this contest between God and Abraham didn’t stop
there. It cast its shadow over Isaac and
over his children and his descendants. This
demand for a child sacrifice echoed through the generations and centuries.
This story is not
just a love story about the triangulated relationship between Abraham, Isaac
and God. The shadow of this story still
haunts us. We suffer under a compulsion to
repeatedly reenact it.
We know that a god
who demands such a death is not worth our worship. We know that a father who obeys such a
command is not worthy the title. The
very hint that people would offer up their own children as a sacrifice is repugnant
to us. And yet, in spite of all that, we
still do it.
Make no mistake, this
story is not just a story with which we have to reckon.It is a story that
reckons with us; it’s a mirror held up to our own life. And looking into it we see into our
souls. We are summoned by a voice that
demands our children’s lives. And we
send them by their hundreds and by their thousands. When they come back to us, scarred by what
they have seen and done and had done to them, wounded in soul and body, or
perhaps even dead, we call their injury or their death a “sacrifice.” It is as if offering our children to God to
be killed or to kill other children whose parents have offered them somehow
makes their obscene wounds holy and their tragic deaths sacred.
I want to know, “Who
is the god who dares to demand this blood?”
Because it is not the God of Abraham, who stopped Abraham’s hand on that
day of contest and terror. It is not the
God of Jesus who taught us that we must love even our enemies. It is not the God of the martyrs who died
rather than lifting a hand to injure another child of God.
When our politicians
of whatever party invoke God to justify war, the God whom they invoke is neither
the God of this book, nor the God of Jesus our master. The blood-thirsty God of war who demands that
we let our country’s children go hungry and send them to crumbling schools, who
demands that we drive on roads and across bridges that are long past needing repair,
who demands that those with treatable illnesses go untreated so that we can
afford to feed the war machine that feeds the blood-thirsty God, this God is
not our God. He is not the God of the
law and prophets, not the God who fed the hungry and healed the sick, not the
God who raised Jesus from the dead.
No, when our
God speaks, we hear a different summons,not one to offer our children as
sacrifices. No, our God wants to
deliver us from the cycle of violence death.
Our God has no desire to be worshiped with bodies and blood. Our God’s final word is, “Do not lay
your hand on the child.”
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment