Learning Curve
Proper 4A
Genesis 6:11-12;
7:24; 8:14-19
June 22, 2014
Rev. John M.
Caldwell, Ph.D.
1st
United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
I want to talk about Noah and his flood, but first I want get
two more stories in front of us, two stories from the Hebrew Bible.
In the eighteenth chapter of Genesis we find an odd
tale. God decides to destroy the cities
of Sodom and Gomorrah, the stench of whose crimes has reached God’s
nostrils. These crimes, incidentally, have
nothing to do with homosexuality and everything to do with their lack of
hospitality to strangers. To God,
hospitality is a big deal.
The oddness of the tale is contained in two debates. The first is a debate that God has with
Godself about whether or not to reveal to Abraham the plans to destroy these
two cities. God decides that this needs
to be part of Abraham’s education. So
God reveals the plans.
Abraham, though, does not respond as we might expect. He takes God to task over the injustice of
this plan. Will you indeed sweep away
the righteous with the wicked? he asks. What
if you find fifty righteous people in the city?
Well, in that case, says God, I would spare the
city.
How about for forty?
Okay, I’ll spare it for forty.
How about for thirty?
How about for twenty? How about
for ten? In each case God promises to
spare the city for the sake of the righteous.
Abraham apparently decided not to press his luck with the
Almighty and in the event the cities were destroyed, although God did go to a
good deal of effort to get Lot and his family out before it happened.
That’s the first story.
The second story comes from Exodus 32. Moses had gone up the mountain to receive the
law. While he was there the Israelites got
bored and decided to write Moses off. They
demanded that Aaron, Moses’ brother, make them an image so that they could worship
God. Aaron cast an image of gold in the
form of a calf and the people threw a party.
God tells Moses what the Israelites are up to. God tells Moses that they are a stiff-necked
people. (This is not news to Moses.) Furthermore, God tells Moses that God is
going to kill them all and start the chosen people project all over again with Moses
this time. But Moses will not let this
happen without objection. “Why are you
angry with the people? You
brought them out of Egypt. If you kill
them all the Egyptians will say that your intentions were evil from the very
beginning. Besides, you’ve already made
promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Do
you really want a reputation as a promise breaker?”
And so God was persuaded to spare the people.
Those are the two stories.
Now, let’s turn to the story about Noah and the flood.
God looked at the earth and saw that—with the exception of
Noah—all of humankind was thoroughly wicked, so God decided to destroy all of
humankind, while sparing Noah and his family.
God came to Noah and said, “All of humankind is thoroughly wicked, so I’ve
decided to destroy them all, but spare you and your family.” God gave Noah the plans for the ark, a plan
for saving the non-swimmers among the animals, even—for reasons that are unclear
to me—the mosquitoes.
And so Noah did what God had told him to do.
Placed with these other stories, the story of Noah’s flood
is disturbing, not because of what’s in the story but because of what isn’t. Noah uttered no word of protest. God planned to kill every man, woman, and
child on the planet, and Noah said nothing.
He is history’s first and perhaps worst case of bystander syndrome.
Not a word, Noah? No
protest, no objection, no moral outrage on behalf of your fellow children of
God? Let alone the creatures, both wild
and domesticated, who were not chosen to go into the ark.
You know, we decorate our babies’ rooms with pictures of
this fellow and his wife (who in the story is nameless, so let’s call her Niamh)
and his boat and the pairs of animals (but never the mosquitoes). There’s real money in the Noah’s ark
decorative motif. You can tell that a Bible
story has been domesticated when there is a Precious Moments® version of it. It has become a sort of visual nursery rhyme that
we tell without thinking about it much.
We see the ark with Noah and Niamh and their floating zoo maybe
as a demonstration of God’s care for us.
Of course, we have to place ourselves in the ark for that to be true. Noah and Niamh were the exceptions—for almost
everyone and everything this is a story of death by drowning, but that doesn’t
show up on the walls of children’s bedrooms.
Nor does Noah’s moral cowardice. Noah can perhaps be excused since it was
early in this story and Noah didn’t know much about God (and, if the story is
anything to go by, God didn’t know much about people). Noah didn’t know that he could or should take
a stand for justice, even with God. Especially
with God.
The tragedy of Noah’s story is that, after the flood was
finished, and God looked around at the mess that it left behind, God had a
change of heart. “I’ll never do that
again!” God said. “And just to make sure that I won’t forget if ever I am
tempted, I’ll put a rainbow in the sky as a reminder.” However we handle this in our theology, in
our story, even God can learn from a mistake.
We, of course, don’t have Noah’s excuse. We know our responsibility to protest. We Protestants should be good at it. It’s in our bones. And it’s in our prayer. The first four petitions that we make in the
Lord’s Prayer are demands for justice. Jesus
did not bring the community of his followers into being in order to teach us to
be bystanders in a world where awful things happen.
I think maybe Noah figured that out, belatedly. Did you know that he was the Bible’s first wine
maker? He was also the Bible’s first
drunk. I wonder if he drank to forget the
time when he stood between the world and a terrible injustice and responded by keeping
his mouth shut and doing “everything that God commanded him.” If we tell the story of Noah and the flood, let’s
tell it as a reminder never to that again, never again to face injustice
with silence.
This
work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment