Monday, December 8, 2014

Such a Time as This: Esther's Call in the Time of Ferguson (Esther 4:1-17; Advent 2a; December 7, 2014)



Such a Time as This

Esther 4:1-17
Advent 2a
December 7, 2014

Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA

I’m glad to be back in Iowa and back in Decorah.  We enjoyed almost everything we did in Houston.  We certainly were glad to see Peter and his family again and especially to see them in their new surroundings.  We enjoyed our visits to the aquarium, the zoo, and the museum of natural science that, oddly, includes a really excellent display of artifacts from ancient Egypt.  It was there that our six year old grandson Ian informed us that the Rosetta Stone, of which they have a replica, was written in “ancient Egypt talk” and in hieroglyphics “to keep it secret.”

The high point for me as a tourist was a visit to the Johnson Space Center and especially seeing the Saturn V, to date the most powerful launch vehicle ever used to put people in space.  I was awestruck by the sheer audacity of the project and the courage of the early pioneers of space flight who understood the systems, knew how precarious they were, and did it anyway.  It took me back in time to when I was a school boy, space was indeed a new frontier, and the future beckoned with promises of deep space exploration and jetpacks for everyone.  I’m still waiting for mine.

The Sixties were not just about the space race.  The shackles of gravity were not the only chains being broken.  Blacks, Latinos, Native Americans, women, gays and lesbians began, one after another, to make claims on the promises of our nation’s founding myths.  The stories they told revealed that the conditions and expectations I took for granted were no part of their experience.  They were no longer willing to have it so.

In my family, we believed that racism only happened in the South.  In the North, there might be racists, but there was no racism.   Therefore, African Americans had no excuse for their poverty and lack of progress.  The myth of equal opportunity was unchallenged in our little world.

But I was clear, even then, that others, especially members of racial minorities, did not see it that way.  Rochester, New York, where we lived, exploded in the summer of 1964 when I was twelve.  In mid-July in the Harlem neighborhood of New York City a riot had broken out when a fifteen year old African American boy was shot and killed by a white police officer. 

In Rochester, the next Friday, July 24, and through the weekend, as many as two thousand rioted in the city’s 7th and 3rd wards.  About a thousand people were arrested, 85% of them black, most between 20 and 40, most of them employed with no prior criminal records.  My family was mystified.  Why were they rioting?  It couldn’t be because of racism.  After all, racism doesn’t exist in the North.  But then there was rioting in North Philadelphia the next month.  Watts burned the next summer.  Two years after Rochester, Detroit and Newark burned.[1]  Six major riots in six major cities and not a one of them in the South.

Every summer we braced for more rioting, wondering which city would be next.  In the meantime, every summer I made money for college by caddying at the premier country club in Rochester, where there were no black members and no black caddies.  It wasn’t a policy.  That would have been racist.  And racism only existed in the South.

“I am not a racist,” I have told myself, anyone else who will listen, and even those who won’t.  I try to treat everyone the same, regardless of their race or ethnicity.  Furthermore, I reject notions that there is no systemic racism in the United States, even in the North.  I know that there is a great deal more to do if we’re ever going to have a country that lives by its creed.  But I always thought the problem lay somewhere else and not with me.

Then I had what could have seemed like a trivial experience, something that happens all the time to all sorts of people.  It was about twenty years ago.  We were living in a “mixed” neighborhood in Syracuse, NY, a neighborhood where most families struggled to make ends meet and to keep their sanity under that pressure.  It was late in the evening and I had taken our dog Molly out for her last pit stop of the day.  It was a summer evening and people were out on their front porches, because they couldn’t afford air conditioning, and, besides, it doesn’t get that hot in Syracuse. 

Above the usual evening buzz of music and conversation, I heard a group of boys, teenagers by the sound of the voices, at the top of the street coming toward me.  I couldn’t see them clearly, because they were between street lights.  It sounded like there were five or six of them.  They were talking loudly, as teenage boys do when they’re hanging together.  Then they walked under a street lamp and I could tell that they were black kids.  Instantly my stomach twisted into a knot.  I could feel my pulse quicken, and my breathing become rapid and shallow.  They were still half a block away when I took Molly back inside the house and locked the front door.  As I said, it was a trivial event.

But I experienced a kind of double vision.  In the front of my brain I was seeing a group of teenage boys enjoying being boisterous together, talking loud and proud, and annoying their elders and neighbors in the process.  In the front of my brain they were harmless; but not in the back of my brain.  In the back of my brain they were not a group of boys; they were a gang.  Their loud talk was threatening.  They were looking for trouble.  Fear gripped me while at the same time I could see through the fear and know that it was not rational.

After the grip of fear loosened, after my pulse and breathing settled back down, what I felt was shame.  I knew in that moment that I was not who I had thought I was.  I knew in that moment that even though I want no part of racism, racism has a part of me.  I knew in that moment that it is possible to have racism without racists.  I knew in that moment that I can think all the right things, say all the right things, do all the right things, but the serpent that is our nation’s original sin can and does still curl itself around my heart.

I enjoyed our stay in Houston, even though I don’t like the city.  I am glad to be home, but I have dreaded this moment, ever since the Monday before Thanksgiving when the grand jury decision was announced.   Ferguson has forced into our consciousness the fact that there is in our road not a just single traveler who has fallen among thieves but a multitude of them: the dead, those whose lives are shortened from the stress of the daily indignities of life as a non-white, and those who have curtailed their own lives out of fear of having an encounter with the police, all issues that in my place of privilege I do not have to face.  I cannot simply cross the road to avoid getting involved.  I have a duty I may not shirk.

It might be easier if I had answers, but I don’t.  You all know me well enough to know that I don’t like not having answers.  I have only some “hints and allegations,” as Paul Simon put it, with or without the “angels in the architecture, spinning in infinity.”[2]

We have been, both in the church and out of it, like a family with an ugly secret.  The family imagines that as long as no one talks about it, they will be safe from their secret.  But the truth is we don’t have secrets; the secrets have us.  From the very beginning, the Methodist Church allowed racism to have its way.  In Philadelphia in 1787, with the Methodist Episcopal Church just three years old, Richard Allen, Absalom Jones, and others established the African Methodist Episcopal Church when officials of St. George’s Methodist removed praying African American members from their knees because they were praying at the wrong time and in the wrong place.  In New York City in 1796, at the John Street Methodist Church, being denied communion until all white families had been served led its African American members to separate and eventually to form the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church.

We are long past due for an extended conversation about race and its role in our denomination, our congregation, our community and our nation.  I don’t know where that conversation will take us.  But I do know that we are the ones who are duty-bound to call for the conversation. 

Why is that?  Why can’t we just sit this out?  Why can’t we let African Americans do the heavy lifting? 

We are duty-bound to call for the conversation for the same reason that it is Esther who must speak to the king.  She has succeeded in doing what most of her people had not: she is passing for Persian.  She won the beauty contest—an early version of The Bachelor—that gained her a place in the palace and marriage to the king.  She is the queen.  She has a place of comfort and privilege.

The question she faces, that her Uncle Mordecai forces her to face, is “How will she use her privilege?”  This really is the question at the heart of the whole of the biblical story:  “How do the privileged use their privilege?”  It is asked of kings.  Will they use their privilege to defend the widow, the orphan and the undocumented workers?  Or will they use their privilege to amass power and wealth?  It is asked above all of Jesus who gave his life’s energy to heal the sick, free the prisoners of spiritual powers, and finally, to confront the establishment.  All this flows from the character of our God who does not dwell in the halls of power or in corporate board rooms, but instead crawls in beside us behind a crowded inn, and kneels beside the dying body of yet another black teenager bleeding out on the streets. 

African Americans, Latinos and other racial groups can call for this conversation, but only white people can make this conversation happen.  So it’s up to us.  It’s up to us to face our own fears and bad faith.  It’s up to us to decide to listen to the testimony of others whose lives are quite different from ours.  It’s up to us to believe them.  It’s up to us to connect the blood of Christ in the chalice on our table with the blood that runs in the streets, the blood of the wounded body of Christ.  It’s up to us to connect the bread on our table with the hungry stomachs and spirits of those who dwell in the desperate places of St. Louis, New York City, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Des Moines, Waterloo, and Decorah.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

National Insecurity State (Jeremiah 1:4-10; 7:1-11; Reign of Christ; November 23, 2014)



National Insecurity State

Jeremiah 1:4-10; 7:1-11
Reign of Christ
November 23, 2014

Rev. John M. Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA

Being a prophet is not an easy gig.  God never sends a prophet to tell people, “Hey, you’re doing fine!  Good work.  Just keep it up.  Keep on keeping on.”  No, when God sends a prophet it’s because the covenant is in trouble.  But, of course, when the covenant is in trouble, it’s because someone has figured out how to get ahead by cutting corners, ignoring commandments, and betraying the deep values of the covenant.  When someone’s wealth depends on ignoring the covenant, the last thing in the world they want is to be reminded.  And reminding people is a prophet’s job.

So no wonder Jeremiah wasn’t terribly enthusiastic about God’s call!  “I’m only a kid.  I don’t know how to do this.  I’m no good at public speaking.”  

God didn’t buy it.  In the first place, Jeremiah was probably not all that young.  He was just inexperienced.  But every experienced prophet started out with no experience.  So that just didn’t fly.  Jeremiah will go where God sends him and say what God tells him to say.  And here are those words again: “Be unafraid.  Be very unafraid.”

Jeremiah’s mission is speak to nations and empires.  His mission will not just be political, but geo-political.  He is appointed “dig up and pull down, to destroy and demolish, to build and plant.”  There are four kinds of ruin before there will be building and planting.  God knows what anyone who has remodeled a kitchen knows: before there are the new appliances, cupboards, countertops and floors, there will be demolition, rubble and dust, dust, dust.  Jeremiah will be God’s way of setting things right, but not until a lot of bad things have happened.

He has his work cut out for him, because Jerusalem is a mess.  Jerusalem doesn’t think so.  Jerusalem, or at least its upper crust, thinks things are just fine.  Well, maybe not fine.  After all, they are a little country caught between two superpowers. 

But with help from the diplomatic and military establishments, the king has it pretty well figured out.  When you are a small country with powerful enemies, it might help to have a powerful friend.  So, with Babylon rising in place of Assyria and threatening all the little kingdoms to its south and west, Judah sought aid from Egypt.  Can you believe it?  They looked to their former masters from when they were slaves for help against the new threat!  But that’s what you do in the real world: you hold your nose and do whatever it takes to survive.

Judah prepared its military, too.  It drafted its young men into arms.  It worked hard to get weapons.  It stockpiled food for sieges.  It made sure that there were sources of water inside its walled cities.  They wouldn’t have to hold out forever, of course, only until they could get word to Egypt and Egypt could send a relief army.  It would work.

Of course, paying for their defenses and for the tribute needed to keep Egypt on its side meant that there simply wasn’t any money to spare.  They couldn’t afford any social welfare programs.  It might be fine to provide for the poor in times of plenty, but these were no longer those times.  The widows, the orphans, and the guest workers would just have to look out for themselves.

But with this belt-tightening, the diplomacy, and the preparations for defense, Judah stood as good a chance as any of the little kingdoms.  Besides, Judah had something those others did not.  They had a special relationship with their God, Yahweh.  They were a special people, an exceptional people, a chosen people.  God had chosen them to be in covenant, a choice, they were told, that would last forever.  God would protect them. 

Remember that some seventy-years earlier when Hezekiah was king, in the prophet Isaiah’s time, the Assyrian army had surrounded Jerusalem and then, when everything seemed hopeless, their king Sennacherib heard a rumor of unrest at home in Nineveh and stole away in the night.  God rescued Jerusalem then.  God hadn’t changed.  God could be counted on.  Jerusalem was safe and would always be safe.

God had not just chosen Judah.  God had not only given Judah promises.  God had given them the Torah.  The Temple was in Jerusalem.  God’s name and glory lived there in the Temple in Jerusalem.  The people came to worship and they shouted, “This is the Temple of Yahweh!  The Temple of Yahweh!  The Temple of Yahweh!”  Who or what could possibly threaten the Temple or Jerusalem, the city of the Great King, or Judah God’s chosen people?  Judah had its protective alliances; it had its fighting forces and fortified places; and, above all, it had Yahweh as its covenant God.

Too, bad about the widows, the orphans, and the guest workers, though.

And that, you see, was the flaw in Judah’s plan.  They thought that their security was to be found in armies, alliances and architecture. 

The prophets, however, never saw the problem of Judah’s security in the way Judah’s kings did.  Kings, then as now, saw their job as securing and if possible growing their place among the nations.  They saw their job as increasing their own power—political, economic, and military—to protect the nation.  When they had to choose between justice and power, they chose power.  Protecting the poor was a value that fell far down on their list of priorities.

Unfortunately for Judah’s kings and for Judah itself, in God’s mind Judah’s security was based on two things and only on two things:  Did they put their full trust in God rather than hedging their bets by calling on other gods?  That was the first thing.  The second was this: Did they protect widows, the orphans, and guest workers from the rich and powerful?

A long, long time ago, when I was a seminary student I learned some Hebrew, the language of the Old Testament.  In the advanced class we were each to write a report on a single Hebrew root and the words that are derived from it.  I was assigned the word גָאָל—that’s the verb form—and the related noun, גֹאֵל.  The word is translated in two quite different ways in our English versions.  It is either “avenger” or “redeemer.”  This was a puzzle to me.  How could two ideas as far apart as redemption and vengeance come from the same root? 

I looked at how it was used through the Old Testament, trying to find an answer to the puzzle.  And here is what I found.  Behind the two ideas of “avenger” and “redeemer”, there was another idea, an older and deeper one.  In the absence of an effective criminal justice system, family members protected each other.  If someone was killed, it was the duty of the closest male relative to exact vengeance by killing the killer.  If someone had to sell their land, it was the duty of the closest male relative to buy it back, or redeem it, and restore it to its original owner.  If someone had to sell themselves into slavery, it was the duty of the closest male relative to buy them back, or redeem them, and restore their freedom.  The word that is translated either as avenger or redeemer in its root sense means “the one who acts as next of kin.”  To redeem a debt is to act as next of kin.  To obtain justice is to act as next of kin.

But what of those who have no next of kin obligated to protect them?  What of the widow who has no husband?  What of the orphan who has no father?  What of the guest worker who has no kin at all?  Who protects them?  Who acts as their next of kin?  What I found was this: God acts as the next of kin for those who have no kin.  God appoints God’s self to be the next of kin for the widow, the orphan, and the guest worker.  That is what it means for God to be a redeemer.

The other thing that I found is that God expects that the kings of Israel and Judah will take on this task.  It is the main reason why they are king.  Not to amass armies to conquer their neighbors.  Not to play at the game of geo-politics.  Kings are kings so that they may act as God’s agents to defend the defenseless, to speak for the voiceless.  Widows, orphans, and guest workers are not distractions from a king’s duty.  They are a king’s duty.  The security of Judah depends upon it.  When kings see to the welfare of the poor, things go well for Judah.  When they do not, when they act like the kings around them, Judah is at risk.  In that case, diplomacy will not help.  Armies will not help.  The Temple will not help.

This, of course, is if you believe Jeremiah and the other prophets.  He tells us what he believes God is like and is about in their world.  He tells us God’s point of view.  Maybe he is right.  Maybe he is wrong.  There were prophets other than Jeremiah who believed that that Jeremiah was wrong, that God would bless the king’s diplomatic efforts, that God would bless the king’s armies with success, and above all, that the mere presence of God’s Temple guaranteed Judah’s safety.

As it turned out, of course, history proved Jeremiah right.  Our tradition judges Jeremiah to have been a faithful and true prophet.  The only reason we even know the names of Jeremiah’s opponents is that they are in Jeremiah’s book.  Otherwise, these prophets of realpolitik would have been altogether lost to history.

It is easy to look back and see that Jeremiah was right.  The real trick is do today what he did then.  When I say, for example, that the nation that spends three-quarters of a trillion dollars a year on its armies and then claims that it cannot afford to properly house its two and a half million homeless children[1]—that’s one child in every thirty—has built its security on sand and cannot claim the blessing of Jeremiah’s God, am I right or wrong?  History will eventually provide the proof one way or another, but we haven’t the luxury of waiting for history.  We have to decide now.

That is the challenge posed to us.  This text, like all Biblical texts, invites us into a world in which God is the central actor, but to enter that world we will have to accept the laws of that world.  If we decline the invitation, then we have our world and the way it works and in that world homeless children will have to wait until our enemies are defeated.  But if we accept the invitation, then homeless children come first. 

To be the messenger of stark choices like this one is what it means to be a prophet.  It’s why Jeremiah didn’t want the job.  It’s why I don’t want the job. But sometimes the job chooses the person and not the other way around.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.