Thursday, January 26, 2017

Catching People (3rd Sunday after the Epiphany; Luke 5:1-11; January 22, 2017)

3rd Sunday after the Epiphany – C
Luke 5:1-11
January 22, 2017
Catching People
Rev. John Caldwell, PhD
First United Methodist Church
Decorah, IA
I remember my first time in the German Alps. I was in the service and was attending a training event at the Army’s retreat center in Berchtesgaden. The valley is dominated by the mountains around it and especially by the Jenner. I was struck by the fact that while the Jenner was always recognizable, every view presented in essence a different mountain. Perspective matters. Change the perspective and you get a different view of things.
The same is true of a story like the one that we just heard. There are lots of positions that we can occupy within the story. We could stand in the position of Jesus, or Simon or one of the other fishermen, or a random person in the crowd. There is a certain pressure inside of any story to take the position of the narrator. I tend to resist any pressure that I notice. I’ve been called contrary.
Something that every reader must do—and preachers are readers before they are anything else—is to decide which of the possible positions in the story to occupy. I’ve been trying to occupy Simon’s place.
Simon was a fisherman. But he wasn’t any kind of fisherman that we’re familiar with. He wasn’t a fly fisherman, standing in his waders in the middle of a mountain stream, engaged in a battle of wits with a wary trout. He wasn’t the kind of bass fisherman that I’ve seen on those fishing channels who catch fish on their lures dipped in who-knows-what and seem to hook them faster than they can reel them in.
He wasn’t the kind of fisherman I used to be who spends all day on the water and comes home with nothing to show for it but a sunburn and stories of the one that got away.
He wasn’t like the country preacher who used to spend a good deal of his sermon-writing time sitting on a dock on the river with a fishing pole in his hand. His congregation didn’t mind if he went fishing—after all, they weren’t paying him enough to live on anyway. But they would have objected if he spent time sitting and staring off into space. So he sat and thought and mulled over stories and ideas and stared off into space, but he did it with an alibi in his hand. Sometimes he even baited the hook.
Simon wasn’t a sport fisherman. Sport fishing as we know it was invented by the British aristocracy in the eighteenth century. Simon was not a member of anybody’s aristocracy. Simon was a peasant without any land who had partnered up with James and John, Zebedee’s boys, to work the Lake of Galilee instead of the rocky soil of the Galilean countryside.
It wasn’t much of a lake. It was just a little over seven miles across and thirteen miles long. There were fish, but they weren’t free for the catching. The fish in the lakes of the Roman Empire belonged to the Empire and it was not about to give them away. The Empire delegated the right to fish to the governors and client kings, like Herod Antipas, who paid for the privilege with tribute money and goods. Herod in turn contracted with chief tax collectors who oversaw the whole apparatus for squeezing the peasant classes of every surplus they generated. Fishing families formed syndicates—Simon and the Zebedee boys were one such—who arranged with a broker for a lease in exchange for money and a percentage of the catch. They in turn sold their fish to processors who also had to acquire licenses and pay money and a percentage of the processed fish. It was quite a racket and we can say with certainty that it was not arranged for the benefit and profit of Simon and his partners. Simon and his partners were cogs in the imperial machinery for extracting wealth from its territories.1
But the cogs didn’t have a whole lot of choice. Peasants who had lost their land had very few resources. And it seemed that every year there were more and more displaced peasants. The land itself was producing less food, so there was a great deal of pressure on other sources. The Lake of Galilee was badly over-fished. The only thing that kept it from being emptied entirely was the inefficient nature of the technology used for fishing.
Simon and James and John used casting nets. Nets like they used are still in use in some places in the world. The nets are usually circular and weighted around the edges. The fisherman holds on to one edge and throws the net so that it covers the surface of the water. The net sinks into the water and then the fisherman hauls it back into the boat (or into more shallow water) and sorts out whatever has been snared in the net. Then he repeats the process. All night long. Simon’s syndicate at least had boats to use, so they could cover more of the lake in a night’s fishing.
At dawn they would return to land, hauling the boats up on the shore. They would sell their fish—if they had caught any—pay off the tax collector, repair their nets, and perform any needed maintenance on their boats. Then at mid-day or so they would sleep to get ready for the next night’s work. It was better than starvation, but not always by much.
It had been one of those nights when the nets brought up nothing that could be eaten or sold. Simon was discouraged, hungry and exhausted. He was like that too many mornings, but there was no help for it. It was that, becoming a bandit, or the slow starvation of the day laborer. Too many more mornings like this one and those choices might start to look better.
As Simon sat mending his nets, along came a crowd. They were following and pressing in on a wandering preacher/wonder-worker. This in itself was not all that unusual. These traveling preachers broke the monotony of peasant life. People were usually willing to share what little surplus they had managed to hide from the landowners and their agents. And, if sometimes when they performed their cures sick people actually got better, so much the better. This time it was Jesus, who had come to Simon’s town Capernaum after the near-lynching in Nazareth. Jesus had stayed with Simon and had healed Simon’s mother-in-law.
Jesus was being pressed by the crowd who wanted to hear him preach. So Jesus, whom Simon recognized certainly, but may not have known all that well, commandeered his boat and the exhausted Simon with it, so that Jesus would have a place to sit and be heard by the crowd.
When he had finished, he offered payment: he told Simon to put out into deeper water and let down his nets.
I can just imagine how well this suggestion was received. Have you ever been doing something that you know how to do, that you may even have some expertise in, and have someone look over your shoulder and tell how it ought to be done? I think maybe the narrator missed the tone of Simon’s answer to Jesus. I think it sounded more like this: “Fine. Whatever. We’ve fished this stupid lake all night long. There is nothing in it. But you’re the expert. So I’ll give it one more try on the strength of your years of experience at doing my job.”
And don’t you just hate it when the amateur with the advice turns out to be right? I’m pretty sure Simon did. But he reacted as a fisherman forced to deal with a catch far larger than he was prepared for. There were so many fish that it was impossible to lift the net out of the water without breaking it, so he called his partners to help. Even so, the catch threatened to sink both boats. After a night of fruitless labor, maybe it was just all too much.
Simon’s didn’t just react to being “shown up” by a rank amateur, nor simply to the huge catch. He reacted as someone who is in the presence of something uncanny, something not just extraordinary, but supernatural. With the hair on the back of his neck raised and overwhelmed with awe, he thought only to make it stop.
Simon was little different from us in this. He believed in God. He was a good Jew, as good a Jew as he could be, given the life he lived. It is one thing to tell the stories of God’s mighty deeds in the past, to pray for a good catch and safe night as they shoved off from shore, or to pray for his family and their health. There was the world of faith, with its stories and its marvels, and there was the ordinary world in which he was a struggling fisherman trying to support himself and his family. The two worlds may border on one another, but here, this morning, the world of marvels had invaded his working world. It was too much.
“Go away from me, Master! I am a sinner.” It was a good excuse, a reasonable excuse. He was clearly in the presence of the Holy. Just what that meant, he didn’t know, but he knew it when he saw it. And he knew what he was. And there was just no way that the world of the Holy was going to fit into his world, or he into it. Like I say, it was a reasonable excuse.
But the Holy is often not very reasonable. It does not respect the boundaries we have set up for it. We construct our theories about the life we live. We construct our theories about who or what God is. And then, when we’ve got it figured out, when it makes sense and we’re comfortable with the result, the God we think we’ve defined and bounded and limited turns out to be alive and not at all bound to rules we have made. If we are, like Simon, unfortunate enough to be confronted with the living God, we are likely to find ourselves undone, unmade, dissolved.
We just want it to stop. And yet we don’t. We just want to go back to our lives. And we pray that we won’t have to do that. This is what it is like to stand before what Rudolf Otto called the mysterium tremendum2, “the tremendous mystery,” that threatens to undo us but before which we stand, fascinated, frozen in place, unable to move. Simon knew that he could not move, so he told Jesus to go, before his life was unmade. But Jesus paid no attention to him.
In spite of that it turned out that Simon was not unmade, not entirely at any rate. His former life with its struggles, its little triumphs and failures, was not entirely dissolved. He would still be a fisherman. But instead of catching fish, he would catch people.
What would that mean? He had no way of knowing; only time would tell. Simon was not given to brilliant flashes of insight. He was not given his nickname, Peter, “Rocky,” on account of his quick wit. There were some clues, though, that reflecting on his life years later he began to understand. There are realities that anyone who answers Jesus’ call to discipleship must reckon with, realities that not a one of us can avoid, try as we may.
The first is this: following Jesus means that we have to move away from the safety of the shallows near the shoreline into deep waters. Following Jesus is risky. That’s as true for us now as it was for Simon then. It’s true for individuals and it’s also true for congregations. We can be safe or we can follow Jesus, but we can’t do both.
The second reality has to do with some things that seem counter-intuitive. Simon had to let down his nets into water he was certain contained no fish at all. He could have invoked the eight words that have killed so many good ideas in the church: “We tried it once and it didn’t work.” But he didn’t. He did the counter-intuitive thing. We face the need to do some counter-intuitive things, too. Any church that seeks its own survival is doomed. A church thrives by forgetting itself and serving the world in which it is placed. A church is alive to the extent that it gives its life away.
And the third reality, and maybe the hardest to accept, is that, having given up the safety of the shallows and having embraced an invitation to a counter-intuitive act, Simon was overwhelmed by the result. Overwhelmed all the more because he knew that it wasn’t really any of his doing and he could claim no credit. These were not repeatable results and they were not a way to get rich in the fishing business.
When I go to clergy meetings and Cokesbury is there with a book display, I always go looking to see what they have. Truth to tell, I seldom buy much these days. I have vast reserves of unread books. As Jill Sanders, a colleague of mine says, “I am not so much well-read as well-bought.” As I look through the books I am often dismayed at the number of “how to” titles. How to turn around a church’s financial struggle. How to start a small group ministry. How to start a new church. How to have a successful building program.
My colleagues are struggling with real problems and they think they want a new set of techniques, some off-the-shelf program that will meet their need, or some new technology that will make this church thing “work.” Cokesbury is more than willing to sell them books with titles that seem to fit the bill, written by people who did it once somewhere and claim to have bottled just the magic elixir that the church needs. “Step right up here, folks. Let me introduce you to the latest wonder drug, a potion so powerful it will nearly raise the dead!”
But Simon already knew how to fish: technique wasn’t the issue. He knew nets and boats and he knew the lake: there is no magic answer.
There is no magic answer for us, either. Not for ourselves as individuals and the problems that we have. Not for our congregation and the challenges that we face. Not for our planet and crises it faces. No answers are to be found in new techniques or packaged programs. No, what we have is what Simon Peter had: we have the stuff already on hand, we have an over-fished lake, we have a Jesus who invites us to engage in counter-intuitive deeds, and we have a God who acts to bless us in ways we can neither prevent nor control.
“Do not be afraid,” says Jesus, “from now on you will be catching people.” And we left everything and followed him.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.
1 K. C. Hanson, "The Galilean Fishing Economy and the Jesus Tradition," Biblical Theological Bulletin 27(1997).

2 Rudolf Otto, The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, trans. John W. Harvey (London: Oxford University Press, 1950).

No comments:

Post a Comment